ghsa-rpjm-422r-95mh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:00
Modified
2023-08-24 20:27
Summary
Regular expression denial of service in apache tika
Details

In Apache Tika, a regular expression in our StandardsText class, used by the StandardsExtractingContentHandler could lead to a denial of service caused by backtracking on a specially crafted file. This only affects users who are running the StandardsExtractingContentHandler, which is a non-standard handler.

This was originally fixed in 1.28.2 and 2.4.0. While the fix in version 2.4.0 was complete, the fix for the 1.x branch wasn't incorporated until version 1.28.3. Please see GHSA-qw3f-w4pf-jh5f for more information.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.apache.tika:tika"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.17"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.28.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.apache.tika:tika"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.4.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-30126"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1333"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-05-25T19:29:25Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-05-16T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In Apache Tika, a regular expression in our StandardsText class, used by the StandardsExtractingContentHandler could lead to a denial of service caused by backtracking on a specially crafted file. This only affects users who are running the StandardsExtractingContentHandler, which is a non-standard handler.\n\nThis was originally fixed in 1.28.2 and 2.4.0. While the fix in version 2.4.0 was complete, the fix for the 1.x branch wasn\u0027t incorporated until version 1.28.3. Please see GHSA-qw3f-w4pf-jh5f for more information.",
  "id": "GHSA-rpjm-422r-95mh",
  "modified": "2023-08-24T20:27:39Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T00:00:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-30126"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/83b0de4d60161ebd4bc224141a959ac8c18d95f4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/a36711610fa1f6f5ba0f594803415af795e0b265"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/e76302196ebcafb7b51fce37fbe8256e6c0fbc51"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qw3f-w4pf-jh5f"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/tika"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/dh3syg68nxogbmlg13srd6gjn3h2z6r4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220624-0004"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/05/16/3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/05/31/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/06/27/5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Regular expression denial of service in apache tika"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.