GHSA-RQ93-8X3R-F79V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-23 00:40 – Updated: 2022-04-23 00:40
VLAI?
Details

A Code Execution vulnerability exists in the memcpy function when processing AMF requests in Ezhometech EzServer 7.0, which could let a remote malicious user execute arbitrary code or cause a Denial of Service

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-4750"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-01-13T20:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A Code Execution vulnerability exists in the memcpy function when processing AMF requests in Ezhometech EzServer 7.0, which could let a remote malicious user execute arbitrary code or cause a Denial of Service",
  "id": "GHSA-rq93-8x3r-f79v",
  "modified": "2022-04-23T00:40:33Z",
  "published": "2022-04-23T00:40:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-4750"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79267"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/117391/Ezhometech-EzServer-7.0-Remote-Heap-Corruption.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/524430"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55938"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…