ghsa-rqgr-h8g8-4p6w
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:45
Modified
2022-05-17 05:45
Details
CRLF injection vulnerability in Bugzilla before 3.2.9, 3.4.x before 3.4.9, 3.6.x before 3.6.3, and 4.0.x before 4.0rc1, when Server Push is enabled in a web browser, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and content, and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks, via a crafted URL.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-3172" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-94" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-11-05T17:00:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "CRLF injection vulnerability in Bugzilla before 3.2.9, 3.4.x before 3.4.9, 3.6.x before 3.6.3, and 4.0.x before 4.0rc1, when Server Push is enabled in a web browser, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and content, and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks, via a crafted URL.", "id": "GHSA-rqgr-h8g8-4p6w", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:45:27Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:45:27Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3172" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600464" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-November/050813.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-November/050820.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-November/050830.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42271" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.bugzilla.org/security/3.2.8" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024683" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2878" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2975" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.