GHSA-RRHM-PXGH-HW46

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:18 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:18
VLAI?
Details

Ipswitch IMail Server 2006 before 2006.21 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via unspecified vectors involving an "overwritten destructor."

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-3926"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-07-21T00:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Ipswitch IMail Server 2006 before 2006.21 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via unspecified vectors involving an \"overwritten destructor.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-rrhm-pxgh-hw46",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T18:18:39Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:18:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-3926"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://docs.ipswitch.com/IMail%202006.21/ReleaseNotes/IMail_RelNotes.htm#NewRelease"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26123"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2574"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…