GHSA-RRWW-8J8X-54V7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:59 – Updated: 2025-04-11 04:15
VLAI?
Details

Triangle Research International (aka Tri) Nano-10 PLC devices with firmware r81 and earlier do not properly handle large length values in MODBUS data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (transition to the interrupt state) via a crafted packet to TCP port 502.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-5741"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2013-10-29T03:42:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Triangle Research International (aka Tri) Nano-10 PLC devices with firmware r81 and earlier do not properly handle large length values in MODBUS data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (transition to the interrupt state) via a crafted packet to TCP port 502.",
  "id": "GHSA-rrww-8j8x-54v7",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T04:15:33Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:59:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-5741"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://blogs.ixiacom.com/ixia-blog/hack-scada-zero-day-vulnerability-discovery-on-the-nano-10-plc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/ref/97/tri-nano10.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/97728"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…