ghsa-rw29-r7x7-2gmq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:59
Modified
2022-05-14 03:59
Severity ?
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in PCRE 8.34 through 8.37 and PCRE2 10.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by /^(?P=B)((?P=B)(?J:(?Pc)(?Pa(?P=B)))>WGXCREDITS)/, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8384.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-3210"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119",
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-12-13T16:59:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in PCRE 8.34 through 8.37 and PCRE2 10.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by /^(?P=B)((?P=B)(?J:(?P\u003cB\u003ec)(?P\u003cB\u003ea(?P=B)))\u003eWGXCREDITS)/, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8384.",
  "id": "GHSA-rw29-r7x7-2gmq",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T03:59:12Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T03:59:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3210"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1132"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1636"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2750.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/06/01/7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/12/02/11"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74934"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.