GHSA-RWHF-69PJ-M4JV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-28 12:30 – Updated: 2026-07-30 06:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: nfc: nci: Add parameter validation for packet data

Syzbot reported an uninitialized value bug in nci_init_req, which was introduced by commit 5aca7966d2a7 ("Merge tag 'perf-tools-fixes-for-v6.17-2025-09-16' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools").

This bug arises due to very limited and poor input validation that was done at nic_valid_size(). This validation only validates the skb->len (directly reflects size provided at the userspace interface) with the length provided in the buffer itself (interpreted as NCI_HEADER). This leads to the processing of memory content at the address assuming the correct layout per what opcode requires there. This leads to the accesses to buffer of skb_buff->data which is not assigned anything yet.

Following the same silent drop of packets of invalid sizes at nic_valid_size(), add validation of the data in the respective handlers and return error values in case of failure. Release the skb if error values are returned from handlers in nci_nft_packet and effectively do a silent drop

Possible TODO: because we silently drop the packets, the call to nci_request will be waiting for completion of request and will face timeouts. These timeouts can get excessively logged in the dmesg. A proper handling of them may require to export nci_request_cancel (or propagate error handling from the nft packets handlers).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-40043"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-28T12:15:38Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: nfc: nci: Add parameter validation for packet data\n\nSyzbot reported an uninitialized value bug in nci_init_req, which was\nintroduced by commit 5aca7966d2a7 (\"Merge tag\n\u0027perf-tools-fixes-for-v6.17-2025-09-16\u0027 of\ngit://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools\").\n\nThis bug arises due to very limited and poor input validation\nthat was done at nic_valid_size(). This validation only\nvalidates the skb-\u003elen (directly reflects size provided at the\nuserspace interface) with the length provided in the buffer\nitself (interpreted as NCI_HEADER). This leads to the processing\nof memory content at the address assuming the correct layout\nper what opcode requires there. This leads to the accesses to\nbuffer of `skb_buff-\u003edata` which is not assigned anything yet.\n\nFollowing the same silent drop of packets of invalid sizes at\n`nic_valid_size()`, add validation of the data in the respective\nhandlers and return error values in case of failure. Release\nthe skb if error values are returned from handlers in\n`nci_nft_packet` and effectively do a silent drop\n\nPossible TODO: because we silently drop the packets, the\ncall to `nci_request` will be waiting for completion of request\nand will face timeouts. These timeouts can get excessively logged\nin the dmesg. A proper handling of them may require to export\n`nci_request_cancel` (or propagate error handling from the\nnft packets handlers).",
  "id": "GHSA-rwhf-69pj-m4jv",
  "modified": "2026-07-30T06:32:12Z",
  "published": "2025-10-28T12:30:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-40043"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ba68bea1e356f466ad29449938bea12f5f3711f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/74837bca0748763a77f77db47a0bdbe63b347628"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8fcc7315a10a84264e55bb65ede10f0af20a983f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9c328f54741bd5465ca1dc717c84c04242fac2e1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfdda0123dde406dbff62e7e9136037e97998a15"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c395d1e548cc68e84584ffa2e3ca9796a78bf7b9"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…