ghsa-rxj2-pmxv-j3x6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:10
Modified
2022-05-13 01:10
Details
Integer overflow in the ordered_malloc function in boost/pool/pool.hpp in Boost Pool before 3.9 makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to perform memory-related attacks such as buffer overflows via a large memory chunk size value, which causes less memory to be allocated than expected.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-2677" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-07-25T19:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Integer overflow in the ordered_malloc function in boost/pool/pool.hpp in Boost Pool before 3.9 makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to perform memory-related attacks such as buffer overflows via a large memory chunk size value, which causes less memory to be allocated than expected.", "id": "GHSA-rxj2-pmxv-j3x6", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:10:00Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:10:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2677" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202105-04" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/78326" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6701" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://kqueue.org/blog/2012/03/05/memory-allocator-security-revisited" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-July/083416.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-June/082977.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:065" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/05/1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/07/13" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.