GHSA-RXMX-G7HR-8MX4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-07 18:15 – Updated: 2026-05-07 16:44
VLAI
Summary
OpenClaw: Zalo replay dedupe keys could suppress messages across chats or senders
Details
Summary
Before OpenClaw 2026.4.2, Zalo webhook replay dedupe keys were not scoped strongly enough across chat and sender dimensions. Legitimate events from different conversations or senders could collide and be dropped as duplicates.
Impact
Cross-conversation or cross-sender collisions could cause silent message suppression and break bot workflows. This was an availability issue in webhook event processing.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Affected versions:
<= 2026.4.1 - Patched versions:
>= 2026.4.2 - Latest published npm version:
2026.4.1
Fix Commit(s)
ef7c553dd16ee579f1d1a363f5881a99726c1412— scope Zalo webhook replay dedupe across the missing event dimensions
Release Process Note
The fix is present on main and is staged for OpenClaw 2026.4.2. Publish this advisory after the 2026.4.2 npm release is live.
Thanks @D0ub1e-D for reporting.
Severity
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.4.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.4.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-41354"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-349",
"CWE-440"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-07T18:15:59Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nBefore OpenClaw 2026.4.2, Zalo webhook replay dedupe keys were not scoped strongly enough across chat and sender dimensions. Legitimate events from different conversations or senders could collide and be dropped as duplicates.\n\n## Impact\n\nCross-conversation or cross-sender collisions could cause silent message suppression and break bot workflows. This was an availability issue in webhook event processing.\n\n## Affected Packages / Versions\n\n- Package: `openclaw` (npm)\n- Affected versions: `\u003c= 2026.4.1`\n- Patched versions: `\u003e= 2026.4.2`\n- Latest published npm version: `2026.4.1`\n\n## Fix Commit(s)\n\n- `ef7c553dd16ee579f1d1a363f5881a99726c1412` \u2014 scope Zalo webhook replay dedupe across the missing event dimensions\n\n## Release Process Note\n\nThe fix is present on `main` and is staged for OpenClaw `2026.4.2`. Publish this advisory after the `2026.4.2` npm release is live.\n\nThanks @D0ub1e-D for reporting.",
"id": "GHSA-rxmx-g7hr-8mx4",
"modified": "2026-05-07T16:44:15Z",
"published": "2026-04-07T18:15:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-rxmx-g7hr-8mx4"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41354"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/ef7c553dd16ee579f1d1a363f5881a99726c1412"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-insufficient-scope-in-zalo-webhook-replay-dedupe-keys"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw: Zalo replay dedupe keys could suppress messages across chats or senders"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…