GHSA-V2Q2-JXH8-M5H8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:14 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:48
VLAI
Details
A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients.
Severity
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-8610"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-11-13T22:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients.",
"id": "GHSA-v2q2-jxh8-m5h8",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:48:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:14:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-8610"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2019-5072835.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3773"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US\u0026docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03897en_us"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2016-8610"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20171130-0001"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:35.openssl.asc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.360.cn/cve/CVE-2016-8610"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=af58be768ebb690f78530f796e92b8ae5c9a4401"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=af58be768ebb690f78530f796e92b8ae5c9a4401"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-8610"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2494"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2493"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1802"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1801"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1658"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1414"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0286.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0574.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93841"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037084"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…