ghsa-v2w5-mxw3-ccwc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-04-04 18:30
Modified
2023-04-11 15:30
Severity ?
Details

An issue was discovered in Samsung Exynos Mobile Processor and Baseband Modem Processor for Exynos 1280, Exynos 2200, and Exynos Modem 5300. An integer overflow in IPv4 fragment handling can occur due to insufficient parameter validation when reassembling these fragments.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-28613"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-04-04T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in Samsung Exynos Mobile Processor and Baseband Modem Processor for Exynos 1280, Exynos 2200, and Exynos Modem 5300. An integer overflow in IPv4 fragment handling can occur due to insufficient parameter validation when reassembling these fragments.",
  "id": "GHSA-v2w5-mxw3-ccwc",
  "modified": "2023-04-11T15:30:28Z",
  "published": "2023-04-04T18:30:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28613"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://semiconductor.samsung.com/processor/mobile-processor"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://semiconductor.samsung.com/processor/modem"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://semiconductor.samsung.com/support/quality-support/product-security-updates"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/172177/Shannon-Baseband-Integer-Overflow.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.