ghsa-v3hc-v42h-rp66
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 16:52
Modified
2022-05-24 16:52
Details

The virConnectBaselineHypervisorCPU() and virConnectCompareHypervisorCPU() libvirt APIs, 4.x.x before 4.10.1 and 5.x.x before 5.4.1, accept an "emulator" argument to specify the program providing emulation for a domain. Since v1.2.19, libvirt will execute that program to probe the domain's capabilities. Read-only clients could specify an arbitrary path for this argument, causing libvirtd to execute a crafted executable with its own privileges.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-10168"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-08-02T13:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The virConnectBaselineHypervisorCPU() and virConnectCompareHypervisorCPU() libvirt APIs, 4.x.x before 4.10.1 and 5.x.x before 5.4.1, accept an \"emulator\" argument to specify the program providing emulation for a domain. Since v1.2.19, libvirt will execute that program to probe the domain\u0027s capabilities. Read-only clients could specify an arbitrary path for this argument, causing libvirtd to execute a crafted executable with its own privileges.",
  "id": "GHSA-v3hc-v42h-rp66",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T16:52:20Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T16:52:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-10168"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/libvirt-privesc-vulnerabilities"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10168"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-18"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.