GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-V4QQ-9XC6-V286

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-08 03:31 – Updated: 2026-07-30 06:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

orangefs: fix xattr related buffer overflow...

Willy Tarreau w@1wt.eu forwarded me a message from Disclosure disclosure@aisle.com with the following warning:

The helper xattr_key() uses the pointer variable in the loop condition rather than dereferencing it. As key is incremented, it remains non-NULL (until it runs into unmapped memory), so the loop does not terminate on valid C strings and will walk memory indefinitely, consuming CPU or hanging the thread.

I easily reproduced this with setfattr and getfattr, causing a kernel oops, hung user processes and corrupted orangefs files. Disclosure sent along a diff (not a patch) with a suggested fix, which I based this patch on.

After xattr_key started working right, xfstest generic/069 exposed an xattr related memory leak that lead to OOM. xattr_key returns a hashed key. When adding xattrs to the orangefs xattr cache, orangefs used hash_add, a kernel hashing macro. hash_add also hashes the key using hash_log which resulted in additions to the xattr cache going to the wrong hash bucket. generic/069 tortures a single file and orangefs does a getattr for the xattr "security.capability" every time. Orangefs negative caches on xattrs which includes a kmalloc. Since adds to the xattr cache were going to the wrong bucket, every getattr for "security.capability" resulted in another kmalloc, none of which were ever freed.

I changed the two uses of hash_add to hlist_add_head instead and the memory leak ceased and generic/069 quit throwing furniture.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-40306"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-08T01:16:02Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\norangefs: fix xattr related buffer overflow...\n\nWilly Tarreau \u003cw@1wt.eu\u003e forwarded me a message from\nDisclosure \u003cdisclosure@aisle.com\u003e with the following\nwarning:\n\n\u003e The helper `xattr_key()` uses the pointer variable in the loop condition\n\u003e rather than dereferencing it. As `key` is incremented, it remains non-NULL\n\u003e (until it runs into unmapped memory), so the loop does not terminate on\n\u003e valid C strings and will walk memory indefinitely, consuming CPU or hanging\n\u003e the thread.\n\nI easily reproduced this with setfattr and getfattr, causing a kernel\noops, hung user processes and corrupted orangefs files. Disclosure\nsent along a diff (not a patch) with a suggested fix, which I based\nthis patch on.\n\nAfter xattr_key started working right, xfstest generic/069 exposed an\nxattr related memory leak that lead to OOM. xattr_key returns\na hashed key.  When adding xattrs to the orangefs xattr cache, orangefs\nused hash_add, a kernel hashing macro. hash_add also hashes the key using\nhash_log which resulted in additions to the xattr cache going to the wrong\nhash bucket. generic/069 tortures a single file and orangefs does a\ngetattr for the xattr \"security.capability\" every time. Orangefs\nnegative caches on xattrs which includes a kmalloc. Since adds to the\nxattr cache were going to the wrong bucket, every getattr for\n\"security.capability\" resulted in another kmalloc, none of which were\never freed.\n\nI changed the two uses of hash_add to hlist_add_head instead\nand the memory leak ceased and generic/069 quit throwing furniture.",
  "id": "GHSA-v4qq-9xc6-v286",
  "modified": "2026-07-30T06:32:22Z",
  "published": "2025-12-08T03:31:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-40306"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/025e880759c279ec64d0f754fe65bf45961da864"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15afebb9597449c444801d1ff0b8d8b311f950ab"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9127d1e90c90e5960c8bc72a4ce2c209691a7021"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc812574de633cf9a9ad6974490e45f6a4bb5126"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c2ca015ac109fd743fdde27933d59dc5ad46658e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6564ff6b53c9a8dc786b6f1c51ae7688273f931"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e09a096104fc65859422817fb2211f35855983fe"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef892d2bf4f3fa2c8de1677dd307e678bdd3d865"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…