GHSA-V52H-Q97R-4W5H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:05 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:05
VLAI?
Details
Multiple buffer overflows in Firebird 2.1 allow attackers to trigger memory corruption and possibly have other unspecified impact via certain input processed by (1) config\ConfigFile.cpp or (2) msgs\check_msgs.epp. NOTE: if ConfigFile.cpp reads a configuration file with restrictive permissions, then the ConfigFile.cpp vector may not cross privilege boundaries and perhaps should not be included in CVE.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-2606"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-05-11T10:19:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple buffer overflows in Firebird 2.1 allow attackers to trigger memory corruption and possibly have other unspecified impact via certain input processed by (1) config\\ConfigFile.cpp or (2) msgs\\check_msgs.epp. NOTE: if ConfigFile.cpp reads a configuration file with restrictive permissions, then the ConfigFile.cpp vector may not cross privilege boundaries and perhaps should not be included in CVE.",
"id": "GHSA-v52h-q97r-4w5h",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:05:15Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:05:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-2606"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34201"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/37308"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/37309"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/29501"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2708"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1529"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/468070/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28478"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…