GHSA-V592-XF75-856P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-06-29 21:12 – Updated: 2025-01-30 14:39
VLAI?
Summary
Erroneous Proof of Work calculation in geth
Details

Impact

An ethash mining DAG generation flaw in Geth could cause miners to erroneously calculate PoW in an upcoming epoch (estimated early January, 2021). This happened on the ETC chain on 2020-11-06. This issue is relevant only for miners, non-mining nodes are unaffected.

Patches

This issue is also fixed as of 1.9.24. Thanks to @slavikus for bringing the issue to our attention and writing the fix.

Workarounds

This PR implements a patch: https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/21793

References

https://blog.ethereum.org/2020/11/12/geth_security_release/

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in go-ethereum * Email us at security@ethereum.org

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.9.24"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-26240"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-682"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-21T21:52:58Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nAn ethash mining DAG generation flaw in Geth could cause miners to erroneously calculate PoW in an upcoming epoch (estimated early January, 2021). This happened on the ETC chain on 2020-11-06. This issue is relevant only for miners, non-mining nodes are unaffected.\n\n### Patches\nThis issue is also fixed as of 1.9.24. Thanks to @slavikus for bringing the issue to our attention and writing the fix. \n\n### Workarounds\nThis PR implements a patch: https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/21793 \n\n### References\nhttps://blog.ethereum.org/2020/11/12/geth_security_release/\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [go-ethereum](https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum)\n* Email us at [security@ethereum.org](mailto:security@ethereum.org)",
  "id": "GHSA-v592-xf75-856p",
  "modified": "2025-01-30T14:39:18Z",
  "published": "2021-06-29T21:12:56Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/security/advisories/GHSA-v592-xf75-856p"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-26240"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/21793"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/commit/d990df909d7839640143344e79356754384dcdd0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.ethereum.org/2020/11/12/geth_security_release"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Erroneous Proof of Work calculation in geth"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…