ghsa-v59w-72qc-xg55
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:34
Modified
2022-05-17 03:34
Severity ?
Details
pcre_jit_compile.c in PCRE 8.35 does not properly use table jumps to optimize nested alternatives, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted string, as demonstrated by packets encountered by Suricata during use of a regular expression in an Emerging Threats Open ruleset.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-9769" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-03-28T16:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "pcre_jit_compile.c in PCRE 8.35 does not properly use table jumps to optimize nested alternatives, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted string, as demonstrated by packets encountered by Suricata during use of a regular expression in an Emerging Threats Open ruleset.", "id": "GHSA-v59w-72qc-xg55", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:34:32Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:34:32Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-9769" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.debian.org/819050" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/1693" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://vcs.pcre.org/pcre?view=revision\u0026revision=1475" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/03/26/1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/85570" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035424" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.