ghsa-v73p-8445-35p5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:05
Modified
2022-05-17 03:05
Details
Tor before 0.2.4.23 and 0.2.5 before 0.2.5.6-alpha maintains a circuit after an inbound RELAY_EARLY cell is received by a client, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct traffic-confirmation attacks by using the pattern of RELAY and RELAY_EARLY cells as a means of communicating information about hidden service names.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-5117" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-07-30T16:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Tor before 0.2.4.23 and 0.2.5 before 0.2.5.6-alpha maintains a circuit after an inbound RELAY_EARLY cell is received by a client, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct traffic-confirmation attacks by using the pattern of RELAY and RELAY_EARLY cells as a means of communicating information about hidden service names.", "id": "GHSA-v73p-8445-35p5", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:05:52Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:05:52Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-5117" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-security-advisory-relay-early-traffic-confirmation-attack" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-announce/2014-July/000093.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-announce/2014-July/000094.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-July/034180.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1038" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/60084" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/60647" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.