GHSA-V76P-62QX-WWQ2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-07 16:18 – Updated: 2026-10-07 16:18
VLAI
Summary
ImageSharp: Tiled fax TIFF: tile buffer sized by TileWidth but fax decompressor writes scanlines of ImageWidth — heap OOB write
Details

Summary

When decoding a tiled TIFF with fax compression (T4/T6/MH), DecodeTilesChunky allocates each tile buffer from TileWidth (ceil(TileWidth*bpp/8)*TileLength bytes) but constructs the fax decompressor with frame.Width: TiffDecompressorsFactory ignores the isTiled/tileWidth/tileHeight parameters entirely. The T4/T6/MH decompressors treat the full image width as the scanline length and advance (and really write, via read-modify-write bit ops) frame.Width bits per row, with no bounds check against the tile buffer. The very first tile therefore writes linearly out of bounds — about ImageWidth/8 bytes per row × TileLength rows into a TileWidth-sized buffer. With ImageWidth=4,000,000, TileWidth=16, TileLength=16 this writes ~2 MB past a 32-byte buffer and kills the process deterministically; a T6 all-white variant advances the bit offset by >512 MB silently, showing an alarm-free heap-corruption window for the same defect. A crafted file fully controls the OOB length per tile and works with perfectly legal per-row run codes (no overlong runs needed).

Verified at commit 5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8 (main; latest release v4.1.0, the supported major).

Details

Root cause: a size mismatch between tile buffer allocation and decompressor width, because the factory drops the tile parameters.

  • Allocation: TiffDecoderCore.cs#L792-L794 — bytesPerTileRow = RoundUpToMultipleOfEight(tileWidth*bitsPerPixel); tile buffer = bytesPerTileRow*tileLength bytes (32 bytes in the PoC)
  • Mismatch: TiffDecoderCore.cs#L797 — CreateDecompressor<TPixel>(frame.Width, ..., isTiled: true, tileWidth, tileLength) passes the full frame width
  • Factory drops tile params: TiffDecompressorsFactory.cs#L56-L64 — T4/T6/MH decompressors receive only width (= frame.Width); isTiled/tileWidth/tileHeight ignored
  • OOB write sink: T4TiffCompression.cs#L69-L119, T6TiffCompression.cs#L76-L108 — per-row advance of this.width bits via BitWriterUtils.WriteBits with no buffer-length check (BitWriterUtils.cs#L51); note TiffDecoderCore.cs:829-831 later reads the buffer in bytesPerTileRow strides, confirming the protocol expects tile-width rows

Attack surface: Image.Load(stream) on an attacker-supplied tiled TIFF (TiffDecoderCore.DecodeImageWithTiles → DecodeTilesChunky). Default configuration; only requirement is a standard tiled TIFF header (TileWidth=16, TileLength=16) + Compression=3 (T4; T6 also constructible).

Suggested remediation: 1. Short-term: when isTiled, construct the T4/T6/MH decompressor with tileWidth (not frame width), or clip row writes to the caller-provided buffer length. 2. Root fix: bound the write side of BitWriterUtils (pass remaining bits), and validate every fax row advance against buffer capacity on both tiled and strip paths. 3. Regression tests: Compression=2/3/4 × tiled with TileWidth < ImageWidth, including a T6 black-pixel row (forces real WriteBit).

PoC

Full PoC posted as the first comment below: Program.cs (driver), poc-tiled-t4.tif (crafted file, ~9.8 KB, base64 inline), README.

  1. Build a small console project referencing src/ImageSharp/ImageSharp.csproj and run it against the crafted file (or call Image.Load on it from any host).
  2. Observed with ImageWidth=4,000,000, TileWidth=16, TileLength=16, T4 with 400 makeup codes + EOL per row:

tile payload 9642 bytes; rows write ~2,048,000 bytes into a 32-byte buffer Fatal error. System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. at SixLabors.ImageSharp.Formats.Tiff.Compression.BitWriterUtils.WriteBits(Span`1<Byte>, IntPtr, IntPtr, Byte) at ...T4TiffCompression.WritePixelRun(...) at ...T4TiffCompression.Decompress(...) Aborted (core dumped); exit=134

  1. Controls: the same file with Compression=None decodes normally (container is fine); a T6 all-white-rows variant advances >512 MB of bit offset without a real write (silent corruption window) before tripping on a directory-level TileOffsets count check.

Impact

  • What it is: out-of-bounds write (CWE-787). For any service decoding untrusted tiled TIFFs: remote, default-configuration, deterministic process crash (DoS), plus a heap OOB write whose per-tile length and row width are attacker-tunable — a potential code-execution surface. This is a vulnerability in the library itself, in scope of your SECURITY.md.
  • Who is impacted: applications decoding untrusted TIFF with SixLabors.ImageSharp at the current major (verified on main past v4.1.0); tiled + fax-compressed files are the trigger, which ordinary TIFF writers can produce.


Reported by Kimi Security Team (bug-report@moonshot.ai).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "ImageSharp"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.1.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-106118"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-10-07T16:18:57Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-06T19:17:42Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nWhen decoding a tiled TIFF with fax compression (T4/T6/MH), `DecodeTilesChunky` allocates each tile buffer from **TileWidth** (`ceil(TileWidth*bpp/8)*TileLength` bytes) but constructs the fax decompressor with **frame.Width**: `TiffDecompressorsFactory` ignores the `isTiled/tileWidth/tileHeight` parameters entirely. The T4/T6/MH decompressors treat the full image width as the scanline length and advance (and really write, via read-modify-write bit ops) `frame.Width` bits per row, with no bounds check against the tile buffer. The very first tile therefore writes linearly out of bounds \u2014 about `ImageWidth/8` bytes per row \u00d7 TileLength rows into a `TileWidth`-sized buffer. With ImageWidth=4,000,000, TileWidth=16, TileLength=16 this writes ~2 MB past a 32-byte buffer and kills the process deterministically; a T6 all-white variant advances the bit offset by \u003e512 MB silently, showing an alarm-free heap-corruption window for the same defect. A crafted file fully controls the OOB length per tile and works with perfectly legal per-row run codes (no overlong runs needed).\n\nVerified at commit `5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8` (main; latest release v4.1.0, the supported major).\n\n## Details\n\nRoot cause: a size mismatch between tile buffer allocation and decompressor width, because the factory drops the tile parameters.\n\n- Allocation: [TiffDecoderCore.cs#L792-L794](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/TiffDecoderCore.cs#L792-L794) \u2014 `bytesPerTileRow = RoundUpToMultipleOfEight(tileWidth*bitsPerPixel)`; tile buffer = `bytesPerTileRow*tileLength` bytes (32 bytes in the PoC)\n- Mismatch: [TiffDecoderCore.cs#L797](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/TiffDecoderCore.cs#L797) \u2014 `CreateDecompressor\u003cTPixel\u003e(frame.Width, ..., isTiled: true, tileWidth, tileLength)` passes the full frame width\n- Factory drops tile params: [TiffDecompressorsFactory.cs#L56-L64](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/Compression/TiffDecompressorsFactory.cs#L56-L64) \u2014 T4/T6/MH decompressors receive only `width` (= frame.Width); `isTiled/tileWidth/tileHeight` ignored\n- OOB write sink: [T4TiffCompression.cs#L69-L119](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/Compression/Decompressors/T4TiffCompression.cs#L69-L119), `T6TiffCompression.cs#L76-L108` \u2014 per-row advance of `this.width` bits via `BitWriterUtils.WriteBits` with no buffer-length check ([BitWriterUtils.cs#L51](https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8/src/ImageSharp/Formats/Tiff/Compression/BitWriterUtils.cs#L51)); note `TiffDecoderCore.cs:829-831` later reads the buffer in `bytesPerTileRow` strides, confirming the protocol expects tile-width rows\n\nAttack surface: `Image.Load(stream)` on an attacker-supplied tiled TIFF (`TiffDecoderCore.DecodeImageWithTiles` \u2192 `DecodeTilesChunky`). Default configuration; only requirement is a standard tiled TIFF header (TileWidth=16, TileLength=16) + Compression=3 (T4; T6 also constructible).\n\n**Suggested remediation:**\n1. Short-term: when `isTiled`, construct the T4/T6/MH decompressor with `tileWidth` (not frame width), or clip row writes to the caller-provided buffer length.\n2. Root fix: bound the write side of `BitWriterUtils` (pass remaining bits), and validate every fax row advance against buffer capacity on both tiled and strip paths.\n3. Regression tests: Compression=2/3/4 \u00d7 tiled with TileWidth \u003c ImageWidth, including a T6 black-pixel row (forces real `WriteBit`).\n\n## PoC\n\nFull PoC posted as the first comment below: `Program.cs` (driver), `poc-tiled-t4.tif` (crafted file, ~9.8 KB, base64 inline), README.\n\n1. Build a small console project referencing `src/ImageSharp/ImageSharp.csproj` and run it against the crafted file (or call `Image.Load` on it from any host).\n2. Observed with ImageWidth=4,000,000, TileWidth=16, TileLength=16, T4 with 400 makeup codes + EOL per row:\n\n   ```\n   tile payload 9642 bytes; rows write ~2,048,000 bytes into a 32-byte buffer\n   Fatal error. System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory.\n      at SixLabors.ImageSharp.Formats.Tiff.Compression.BitWriterUtils.WriteBits(Span`1\u003cByte\u003e, IntPtr, IntPtr, Byte)\n      at ...T4TiffCompression.WritePixelRun(...)\n      at ...T4TiffCompression.Decompress(...)\n   Aborted (core dumped); exit=134\n   ```\n\n3. Controls: the same file with Compression=None decodes normally (container is fine); a T6 all-white-rows variant advances \u003e512 MB of bit offset without a real write (silent corruption window) before tripping on a directory-level TileOffsets count check.\n\n## Impact\n\n- **What it is:** out-of-bounds write (CWE-787). For any service decoding untrusted tiled TIFFs: remote, default-configuration, deterministic process crash (DoS), plus a heap OOB write whose per-tile length and row width are attacker-tunable \u2014 a potential code-execution surface. This is a vulnerability in the library itself, in scope of your SECURITY.md.\n- **Who is impacted:** applications decoding untrusted TIFF with SixLabors.ImageSharp at the current major (verified on main past v4.1.0); tiled + fax-compressed files are the trigger, which ordinary TIFF writers can produce.\n\n---\n\n---\n\nReported by **Kimi Security Team** (bug-report@moonshot.ai).",
  "id": "GHSA-v76p-62qx-wwq2",
  "modified": "2026-10-07T16:18:57Z",
  "published": "2026-10-07T16:18:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/security/advisories/GHSA-v76p-62qx-wwq2"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-106118"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/pull/3176"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/commit/9ee7d1dd5b62d8c9f16cc755e76828386bc2191f"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/releases/tag/v4.1.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "ImageSharp: Tiled fax TIFF: tile buffer sized by TileWidth but fax decompressor writes scanlines of ImageWidth \u2014 heap OOB write"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…