ghsa-v7g7-rpcw-4f58
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:00
Modified
2022-05-17 02:00
Details
smbfs in Samba 3.5.8 and earlier attempts to use (1) mount.cifs to append to the /etc/mtab file and (2) umount.cifs to append to the /etc/mtab.tmp file without first checking whether resource limits would interfere, which allows local users to trigger corruption of the /etc/mtab file via a process with a small RLIMIT_FSIZE value, a related issue to CVE-2011-1089.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2011-1678", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-20", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2011-04-10T02:55:00Z", severity: "LOW", }, details: "smbfs in Samba 3.5.8 and earlier attempts to use (1) mount.cifs to append to the /etc/mtab file and (2) umount.cifs to append to the /etc/mtab.tmp file without first checking whether resource limits would interfere, which allows local users to trigger corruption of the /etc/mtab file via a process with a small RLIMIT_FSIZE value, a related issue to CVE-2011-1089.", id: "GHSA-v7g7-rpcw-4f58", modified: "2022-05-17T02:00:11Z", published: "2022-05-17T02:00:11Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1678", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688980", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66702", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/10", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/11", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/12", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/04/9", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/3", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/05/7", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/07/9", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/16", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/5", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/14/7", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/15/6", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/4", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/22/6", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/3", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/31/4", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/01/2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:148", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.