ghsa-v8x2-4qqv-89fw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 01:26
Modified
2022-04-29 01:26
Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in Active Directory in Windows 2000 before SP4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (reboot) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an LDAP version 3 search request with a large number of (1) "AND," (2) "OR," and possibly other statements, which causes LSASS.EXE to crash.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2003-0507"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2003-08-07T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in Active Directory in Windows 2000 before SP4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (reboot) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an LDAP version 3 search request with a large number of (1) \"AND,\" (2) \"OR,\" and possibly other statements, which causes LSASS.EXE to crash.",
  "id": "GHSA-v8x2-4qqv-89fw",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T01:26:32Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T01:26:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0507"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=105716669921775\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/9171"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=319709"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/594108"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7930"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.