GHSA-V9FV-MJVX-27P4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:10 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:10
VLAI?
Details
Buffer overflow in the MVG and SVG rendering code in GraphicsMagick 1.3.24 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. Note: This vulnerability exists due to an incomplete patch for CVE-2016-2317.
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-7446"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-02-06T17:59:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in the MVG and SVG rendering code in GraphicsMagick 1.3.24 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. Note: This vulnerability exists due to an incomplete patch for CVE-2016-2317.",
"id": "GHSA-v9fv-mjvx-27p4",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:10:36Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:10:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-7446"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374233"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/06/msg00009.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-10/msg00094.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-10/msg00097.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/18/8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93074"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…