GHSA-VC7J-H8XG-FV5X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-04 17:26 – Updated: 2023-08-04 17:26
VLAI?
Summary
matrix-appservice-bridge doesn't verify the sub parameter of an openId token exhange, allowing unauthorized access to provisioning APIs
Details

Impact

A malicious Matrix server can use a foreign user's MXID in an OpenID exchange, allowing a bad actor to impersonate users when using the provisioning API.

Details

The library does not check that the servername part of the sub parameter (containing the user's claimed MXID) is the same as the servername we are talking to. A malicious actor could spin up a server on any given domain, respond with a sub parameter according to the user they want to act as and use the resulting token to perform provisioning requests.

Workarounds

Disable the provisioning API. If the bridge does not use the provisioning API, you are not vulnerable.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "matrix-appservice-bridge"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "8.1.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "matrix-appservice-bridge"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "9.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "9.0.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "9.0.0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-38691"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-04T17:26:32Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-08-04T17:15:11Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nA malicious Matrix server can use a foreign user\u0027s MXID in an OpenID exchange, allowing a bad actor to impersonate users when using the provisioning API.\n\n### Details\n\nThe library does not check that the servername part of the `sub` parameter (containing the user\u0027s *claimed* MXID) is the same as the servername we are talking to. A malicious actor could spin up a server on any given domain, respond with a `sub` parameter according to the user they want to act as and use the resulting token to perform provisioning requests.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nDisable the provisioning API. If the bridge does not use the provisioning API, you are not vulnerable.\n",
  "id": "GHSA-vc7j-h8xg-fv5x",
  "modified": "2023-08-04T17:26:32Z",
  "published": "2023-08-04T17:26:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-appservice-bridge/security/advisories/GHSA-vc7j-h8xg-fv5x"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-38691"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-appservice-bridge/commit/4c6723a5e7beda65cdf1ae5dbb882e8beaac8552"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-appservice-bridge"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "matrix-appservice-bridge doesn\u0027t verify the sub parameter of an openId token exhange, allowing unauthorized access to provisioning APIs"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…