ghsa-vfp8-xr5w-hr86
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:51
Modified
2022-05-17 00:51
Details
The TFTP server in Cisco IOS 12.2(44)SQ1, 12.2(33)XN1, 12.4(25e)JAM1, 12.4(25e)JAO5m, 12.4(23)JY, 15.0(2)ED1, 15.0(2)EY3, 15.1(3)SVF4a, and 15.2(2)JB1 and IOS XE 2.5.x, 2.6.x, 3.1.xS, 3.2.xS, 3.3.xS, 3.4.xS, and 3.5.xS before 3.6.0S; 3.1.xSG, 3.2.xSG, and 3.3.xSG before 3.4.0SG; 3.2.xSE before 3.3.0SE; 3.2.xXO before 3.3.0XO; 3.2.xSQ; 3.3.xSQ; and 3.4.xSQ allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device hang or reload) via multiple requests that trigger improper memory management, aka Bug ID CSCts66733.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-0681" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-07-24T16:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The TFTP server in Cisco IOS 12.2(44)SQ1, 12.2(33)XN1, 12.4(25e)JAM1, 12.4(25e)JAO5m, 12.4(23)JY, 15.0(2)ED1, 15.0(2)EY3, 15.1(3)SVF4a, and 15.2(2)JB1 and IOS XE 2.5.x, 2.6.x, 3.1.xS, 3.2.xS, 3.3.xS, 3.4.xS, and 3.5.xS before 3.6.0S; 3.1.xSG, 3.2.xSG, and 3.3.xSG before 3.4.0SG; 3.2.xSE before 3.3.0SE; 3.2.xXO before 3.3.0XO; 3.2.xSQ; 3.3.xSQ; and 3.4.xSQ allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device hang or reload) via multiple requests that trigger improper memory management, aka Bug ID CSCts66733.", "id": "GHSA-vfp8-xr5w-hr86", "modified": "2022-05-17T00:51:52Z", "published": "2022-05-17T00:51:52Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0681" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150722-tftp" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150722-tftp/cvrf/cisco-sa-20150722-tftp_cvrf.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033023" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.