GHSA-VFPF-55WM-VCV7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:05 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:05
VLAI?
Details
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.x before 7.0.0.13, and WebSphere Application Server Feature Pack for Web Services 6.1.0.9 through 6.1.0.32, when a JAX-WS application is used, does not properly handle an IncludeTimestamp setting in the WS-Security policy, which has unspecified impact and remote attack vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-3186"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-08-30T20:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 7.x before 7.0.0.13, and WebSphere Application Server Feature Pack for Web Services 6.1.0.9 through 6.1.0.32, when a JAX-WS application is used, does not properly handle an IncludeTimestamp setting in the WS-Security policy, which has unspecified impact and remote attack vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-vfpf-55wm-vcv7",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:05:45Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:05:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3186"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/61435"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/67570"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/41173"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PM08360"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PM16014"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21443736"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg24027708"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg24027709"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2215"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…