ghsa-vfqc-qhm9-65mm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:44
Modified
2022-05-13 01:44
Severity ?
Details
A localhost.localdomain whitelist entry in valid_host() in scheduler/client.c in CUPS before 2.2.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary IPP commands by sending POST requests to the CUPS daemon in conjunction with DNS rebinding. The localhost.localdomain name is often resolved via a DNS server (neither the OS nor the web browser is responsible for ensuring that localhost.localdomain is 127.0.0.1).
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-18190" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-290" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-02-16T17:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "A localhost.localdomain whitelist entry in valid_host() in scheduler/client.c in CUPS before 2.2.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary IPP commands by sending POST requests to the CUPS daemon in conjunction with DNS rebinding. The localhost.localdomain name is often resolved via a DNS server (neither the OS nor the web browser is responsible for ensuring that localhost.localdomain is 127.0.0.1).", "id": "GHSA-vfqc-qhm9-65mm", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:44:36Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:44:36Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-18190" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/apple/cups/commit/afa80cb2b457bf8d64f775bed307588610476c41" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1048" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/02/msg00023.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/07/msg00003.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3577-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.