GHSA-VGH3-QFVH-CW6Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:15 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:15
VLAI?
Details

Johnson & Johnson Animas OneTouch Ping devices do not properly generate random numbers, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof meters by sniffing the network and then engaging in an authentication handshake.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-5085"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-330"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-10-05T10:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Johnson \u0026 Johnson Animas OneTouch Ping devices do not properly generate random numbers, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof meters by sniffing the network and then engaging in an authentication handshake.",
  "id": "GHSA-vgh3-qfvh-cw6q",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:15:21Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:15:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-5085"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://community.rapid7.com/community/infosec/blog/2016/10/04/r7-2016-07-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-animas-onetouch-ping-insulin-pump"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-16-279-01"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/884840"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/BLUU-A9SQRS"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93351"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…