GHSA-VH8F-325P-CW9V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-09 00:00 – Updated: 2022-02-12 00:01
VLAI
Details
TP-Link WR886N 3.0 1.0.1 Build 150127 Rel.34123n is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow. Authenticated attackers can crash router httpd services via /userRpm/PingIframeRpm.htm request which contains redundant & in parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-44864"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-120"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-02-08T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "TP-Link WR886N 3.0 1.0.1 Build 150127 Rel.34123n is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow. Authenticated attackers can crash router httpd services via /userRpm/PingIframeRpm.htm request which contains redundant \u0026 in parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-vh8f-325p-cw9v",
"modified": "2022-02-12T00:01:05Z",
"published": "2022-02-09T00:00:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44864"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/zhlu32/cve/blob/main/tplink/wr886n/Tplink-wr886n-V3-Ping-DOS.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…