GHSA-VJJP-V767-CX96

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-04 18:30 – Updated: 2026-03-13 21:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

iommu/io-pgtable-arm: fix size_t signedness bug in unmap path

__arm_lpae_unmap() returns size_t but was returning -ENOENT (negative error code) when encountering an unmapped PTE. Since size_t is unsigned, -ENOENT (typically -2) becomes a huge positive value (0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE on 64-bit systems).

This corrupted value propagates through the call chain: __arm_lpae_unmap() returns -ENOENT as size_t -> arm_lpae_unmap_pages() returns it -> __iommu_unmap() adds it to iova address -> iommu_pgsize() triggers BUG_ON due to corrupted iova

This can cause IOVA address overflow in __iommu_unmap() loop and trigger BUG_ON in iommu_pgsize() from invalid address alignment.

Fix by returning 0 instead of -ENOENT. The WARN_ON already signals the error condition, and returning 0 (meaning "nothing unmapped") is the correct semantic for size_t return type. This matches the behavior of other io-pgtable implementations (io-pgtable-arm-v7s, io-pgtable-dart) which return 0 on error conditions.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23067"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-617"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-04T17:16:17Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niommu/io-pgtable-arm: fix size_t signedness bug in unmap path\n\n__arm_lpae_unmap() returns size_t but was returning -ENOENT (negative\nerror code) when encountering an unmapped PTE. Since size_t is unsigned,\n-ENOENT (typically -2) becomes a huge positive value (0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE\non 64-bit systems).\n\nThis corrupted value propagates through the call chain:\n  __arm_lpae_unmap() returns -ENOENT as size_t\n  -\u003e arm_lpae_unmap_pages() returns it\n  -\u003e __iommu_unmap() adds it to iova address\n  -\u003e iommu_pgsize() triggers BUG_ON due to corrupted iova\n\nThis can cause IOVA address overflow in __iommu_unmap() loop and\ntrigger BUG_ON in iommu_pgsize() from invalid address alignment.\n\nFix by returning 0 instead of -ENOENT. The WARN_ON already signals\nthe error condition, and returning 0 (meaning \"nothing unmapped\")\nis the correct semantic for size_t return type. This matches the\nbehavior of other io-pgtable implementations (io-pgtable-arm-v7s,\nio-pgtable-dart) which return 0 on error conditions.",
  "id": "GHSA-vjjp-v767-cx96",
  "modified": "2026-03-13T21:31:40Z",
  "published": "2026-02-04T18:30:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23067"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/374e7af67d9d9d6103c2cfc8eb32abfecf3a2fd8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41ec6988547819756fb65e94fc24f3e0dddf84ac"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…