ghsa-vpvq-r8h3-q5hv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 03:00
Modified
2022-04-29 03:00
Details

login_radius on OpenBSD 3.2, 3.5, and possibly other versions does not verify the shared secret in a response packet from a RADIUS server, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by spoofing server replies.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-2163"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "login_radius on OpenBSD 3.2, 3.5, and possibly other versions does not verify the shared secret in a response packet from a RADIUS server, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by spoofing server replies.",
  "id": "GHSA-vpvq-r8h3-q5hv",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T03:00:55Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T03:00:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-2163"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17456"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2004-q3/0058.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12617"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openbsd.org/errata35.html#radius"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/10203"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.reseau.nl/advisories/0400-openbsd-radius.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11227"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.