GHSA-VQ94-FV6J-X393
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:34 – Updated: 2025-04-11 04:10
VLAI?
Details
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in user/obits.php in the WP FuneralPress plugin before 1.1.7 for WordPress allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) message, (2) photo-message, or (3) youtube-message parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-3529"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-05-10T21:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in user/obits.php in the WP FuneralPress plugin before 1.1.7 for WordPress allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) message, (2) photo-message, or (3) youtube-message parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-vq94-fv6j-x393",
"modified": "2025-04-11T04:10:11Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:34:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-3529"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/83188"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/121030/WordPress-FuneralPress-1.1.6-Cross-Site-Scripting.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?old_path=%2Fwp-funeral-press\u0026old=690038\u0026new_path=%2Fwp-funeral-press\u0026new=690038"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2013/Mar/282"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/52809"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-funeral-press/changelog"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/24914"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/58790"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…