ghsa-vqgr-f24j-7rxx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:25
Modified
2022-05-13 01:25
Details
Integer underflow in the ksba_oid_to_str function in Libksba before 1.3.2, as used in GnuPG, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted OID in a (1) S/MIME message or (2) ECC based OpenPGP data, which triggers a buffer overflow.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-9087" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-191" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-12-01T15:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Integer underflow in the ksba_oid_to_str function in Libksba before 1.3.2, as used in GnuPG, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted OID in a (1) S/MIME message or (2) ECC based OpenPGP data, which triggers a buffer overflow.", "id": "GHSA-vqgr-f24j-7rxx", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:25:22Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:25:22Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-9087" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/2-Buffer-overflow-and-other-minor-issues-in-GnuPG-and-libksba-TFPA-0012014.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0498.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2014q4/000359.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/60073" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/60189" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/60233" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3078" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2014:234" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:151" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71285" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2427-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.