GHSA-VQHJ-2H3Q-6GHM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 18:20 – Updated: 2022-04-30 18:20
VLAI?
Details
Buffer overflows in Fetchmail 6.0.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via (1) long headers that are not properly processed by the readheaders function, or (2) via long Received: headers, which are not properly parsed by the parse_received function.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2002-1174"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2002-10-11T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflows in Fetchmail 6.0.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via (1) long headers that are not properly processed by the readheaders function, or (2) via long Received: headers, which are not properly parsed by the parse_received function.",
"id": "GHSA-vqhj-2h3q-6ghm",
"modified": "2022-04-30T18:20:41Z",
"published": "2022-04-30T18:20:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1174"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000531"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103340148625187\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002-215.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-171"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10203.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/security/2002/MDKSA-2002-063.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisories/other_advisory-2402.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5825"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5827"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…