GHSA-VQV3-6CP5-XGWR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:19 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:19
VLAI?
Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in Mike Dubman Windows RSH daemon (rshd) 1.7 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string to the shell port (514/tcp). NOTE: this might overlap CVE-2007-4006.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-4005"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-07-26T00:30:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in Mike Dubman Windows RSH daemon (rshd) 1.7 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string to the shell port (514/tcp).  NOTE: this might overlap CVE-2007-4006.",
  "id": "GHSA-vqv3-6cp5-xgwr",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T18:19:25Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:19:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-4005"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4222"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26197"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25044"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018459"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…