GHSA-VRFJ-V9G3-X8Q6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:51 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:34
VLAI?
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in lpd.exe in Mocha W32 LPD 1.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted "recieve jobs" request. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-1687"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-05-04T16:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in lpd.exe in Mocha W32 LPD 1.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted \"recieve jobs\" request. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.",
"id": "GHSA-vrfj-v9g3-x8q6",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:34:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:51:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-1687"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/39394"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.corelan.be:8800/index.php/forum/security-advisories/corelan-10-023-mocha-lpd-remote-buffer-overflow"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.corelan.be:8800/wp-content/forum-file-uploads/mr_me/mochalpd.py_.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/63902"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…