ghsa-vw8c-5cg5-c7cj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:28
Modified
2022-05-13 01:28
Severity ?
Details
Integer overflow in the vmnc decoder in the gstreamer allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via large width and height values, which triggers a buffer overflow.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-9445" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-190" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-01-23T21:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Integer overflow in the vmnc decoder in the gstreamer allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via large width and height values, which triggers a buffer overflow.", "id": "GHSA-vw8c-5cg5-c7cj", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:28:13Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:28:13Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9445" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774533" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://cgit.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-plugins-bad/commit/gst/vmnc/vmncdec.c?id=4cb1bcf1422bbcd79c0f683edb7ee85e3f7a31fe" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.de/2016/11/0day-poc-risky-design-decisions-in.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201705-10" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2974.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0018.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0021.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/18/12" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/18/13" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94421" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.