ghsa-vwjv-mqrc-fc89
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:03
Modified
2022-05-01 18:03
Details
The DHCP relay agent in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and PIX 7.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (dropped packets) via a DHCPREQUEST or DHCPINFORM message that causes multiple DHCPACK messages to be sent from DHCP servers to the agent, which consumes the memory allocated for a local buffer. NOTE: this issue only occurs when multiple DHCP servers are used.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-2461" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-05-02T22:19:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The DHCP relay agent in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and PIX 7.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (dropped packets) via a DHCPREQUEST or DHCPINFORM message that causes multiple DHCPACK messages to be sent from DHCP servers to the agent, which consumes the memory allocated for a local buffer. NOTE: this issue only occurs when multiple DHCP servers are used.", "id": "GHSA-vwjv-mqrc-fc89", "modified": "2022-05-01T18:03:55Z", "published": "2022-05-01T18:03:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-2461" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34026" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25109" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080833172.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/530057" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/35330" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23763" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017999" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018000" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1635" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.