GHSA-VXV8-PX35-96WW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 02:58 – Updated: 2025-04-03 04:07
VLAI?
Details
Buffer overflow in the MSN protocol handler for gaim 0.79 to 1.0.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an "unexpected sequence of MSNSLP messages" that results in an unbounded copy operation that writes to the wrong buffer.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2004-0891"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-01-27T05:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in the MSN protocol handler for gaim 0.79 to 1.0.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an \"unexpected sequence of MSNSLP messages\" that results in an unbounded copy operation that writes to the wrong buffer.",
"id": "GHSA-vxv8-px35-96ww",
"modified": "2025-04-03T04:07:48Z",
"published": "2022-04-29T02:58:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0891"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2188"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17786"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17787"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17790"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11790"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-8-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://gaim.sourceforge.net/security/?id=9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200410-23.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-604.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…