ghsa-w3hc-jprx-2f55
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:14
Modified
2022-05-17 03:14
Details

Integer overflow in Adobe Photoshop CC before 16.0 (aka 2015.0.0) and Adobe Bridge CC before 6.11 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-3110"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-06-24T10:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Integer overflow in Adobe Photoshop CC before 16.0 (aka 2015.0.0) and Adobe Bridge CC before 6.11 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-w3hc-jprx-2f55",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:14:32Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:14:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3110"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb15-13.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/photoshop/apsb15-12.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75243"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032658"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032659"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.