github - ghsa-w3hv-rp5r-hr2c

ghsa-w3hv-rp5r-hr2c

Vulnerability from github

Published

2022-05-13 01:29

Modified

2022-05-13 01:29

Details

Buffer overflow in yaSSL, as used in MySQL 5.5.20 and possibly other versions including 5.5.x before 5.5.22 and 5.1.x before 5.1.62, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, as demonstrated by VulnDisco Pack Professional 9.17. NOTE: as of 20120224, this disclosure has no actionable information. However, because the module author is a reliable researcher, the issue is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes. NOTE: due to lack of details, it is not clear whether this issue is a duplicate of CVE-2012-0492 or another CVE.

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-0882"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-12-21T05:46:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in yaSSL, as used in MySQL 5.5.20 and possibly other versions including 5.5.x before 5.5.22 and 5.1.x before 5.1.62, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, as demonstrated by VulnDisco Pack Professional 9.17.  NOTE: as of 20120224, this disclosure has no actionable information. However, because the module author is a reliable researcher, the issue is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes.  NOTE: due to lack of details, it is not clear whether this issue is a duplicate of CVE-2012-0492 or another CVE.",
  "id": "GHSA-w3hv-rp5r-hr2c",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:29:51Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:29:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-0882"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blogs.oracle.com/sunsecurity/entry/cve_2012_0882buffer_overflow_vulnerability"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789141"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/canvas/2012-February/000011.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/canvas/2012-February/000014.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/02/24/2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

cve-2012-0882

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2012-12-21 02:00

Modified

2024-08-06 18:38

Severity ?

Summary

References

▼	URL	Tags
	https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/canvas/2012-February/000014.html	mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
	https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/canvas/2012-February/000011.html	mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789141	x_refsource_MISC
	http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/02/24/2	mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
	https://blogs.oracle.com/sunsecurity/entry/cve_2012_0882buffer_overflow_vulnerability	x_refsource_MISC

Impacted products

Vendor

Product

Version

▼

n/a

Version: n/a

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T18:38:14.959Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "[Canvas] 20120223 VulnDisco MySQL 0day",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/canvas/2012-February/000014.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[Canvas] 20120207 VulnDisco Pack Professional 9.17",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/canvas/2012-February/000011.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789141"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20120224 Re: MySQL 0-day - does it need a CVE?",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/02/24/2"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://blogs.oracle.com/sunsecurity/entry/cve_2012_0882buffer_overflow_vulnerability"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Buffer overflow in yaSSL, as used in MySQL 5.5.20 and possibly other versions including 5.5.x before 5.5.22 and 5.1.x before 5.1.62, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, as demonstrated by VulnDisco Pack Professional 9.17.  NOTE: as of 20120224, this disclosure has no actionable information. However, because the module author is a reliable researcher, the issue is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes.  NOTE: due to lack of details, it is not clear whether this issue is a duplicate of CVE-2012-0492 or another CVE."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2012-12-21T02:00:00Z",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "[Canvas] 20120223 VulnDisco MySQL 0day",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/canvas/2012-February/000014.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[Canvas] 20120207 VulnDisco Pack Professional 9.17",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/canvas/2012-February/000011.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789141"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20120224 Re: MySQL 0-day - does it need a CVE?",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/02/24/2"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://blogs.oracle.com/sunsecurity/entry/cve_2012_0882buffer_overflow_vulnerability"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2012-0882",
    "datePublished": "2012-12-21T02:00:00Z",
    "dateReserved": "2012-01-19T00:00:00Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T18:38:14.959Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.

Action not permitted