GHSA-W4RJ-FR95-86J5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:26 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:26
VLAI?
Details
Cisco Jabber 10.6.x, 11.0.x, and 11.1.x on Windows allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct STARTTLS downgrade attacks and trigger cleartext XMPP sessions via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCuw87419.
Severity ?
5.9 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-6409"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-12-26T22:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cisco Jabber 10.6.x, 11.0.x, and 11.1.x on Windows allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct STARTTLS downgrade attacks and trigger cleartext XMPP sessions via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCuw87419.",
"id": "GHSA-w4rj-fr95-86j5",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:26:33Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:26:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-6409"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20151224-jab"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/79678"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034540"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.synacktiv.com/ressources/cisco_jabber_starttls_downgrade.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…