ghsa-w4w5-pfmx-65jc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:46
Modified
2022-05-17 03:46
Severity ?
Details
The netlink_sendmsg function in net/netlink/af_netlink.c in the Linux kernel before 3.5.5 does not validate the dst_pid field, which allows local users to have an unspecified impact by spoofing Netlink messages.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-6689" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-284" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-05-02T10:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The netlink_sendmsg function in net/netlink/af_netlink.c in the Linux kernel before 3.5.5 does not validate the dst_pid field, which allows local users to have an unspecified impact by spoofing Netlink messages.", "id": "GHSA-w4w5-pfmx-65jc", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:46:32Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:46:32Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-6689" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/20e1db19db5d6b9e4e83021595eab0dc8f107bef" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848949" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=20e1db19db5d6b9e4e83021595eab0dc8f107bef" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev\u0026m=134522422125983\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev\u0026m=134522422925986\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.5.5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/02/22/10" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72739" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.