GHSA-W5V3-F8XV-J94C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:46 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:46
VLAI?
Details

Autodesk 3D Studio Max (3DSMax) 6 through 9 and 2008 through 2010 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .max file with a MAXScript statement that calls the DOSCommand method, related to "application callbacks."

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-3577"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-11-24T17:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Autodesk 3D Studio Max (3DSMax) 6 through 9 and 2008 through 2010 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .max file with a MAXScript statement that calls the DOSCommand method, related to \"application callbacks.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-w5v3-f8xv-j94c",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:46:25Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:46:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3577"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1023230"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.coresecurity.com/content/3dsmax-arbitrary-command-execution"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/508012/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36634"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…