GHSA-W5V5-5VPM-87MX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-10 00:00 – Updated: 2022-02-10 00:00
VLAI?
Details

Z-Wave devices from Sierra Designs (circa 2013) and Silicon Labs (using S0 security) may use a known, shared network key of all zeros, allowing an attacker within radio range to spoof Z-Wave traffic.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-20003"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-338"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-04T23:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Z-Wave devices from Sierra Designs (circa 2013) and Silicon Labs (using S0 security) may use a known, shared network key of all zeros, allowing an attacker within radio range to spoof Z-Wave traffic.",
  "id": "GHSA-w5v5-5vpm-87mx",
  "modified": "2022-02-10T00:00:50Z",
  "published": "2022-02-10T00:00:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-20003"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://orangecyberdefense.com/global/blog/sensepost/blackhat-conference-z-wave-security"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sensepost.com/cms/resources/conferences/2013/bh_zwave/Security%20Evaluation%20of%20Z-Wave_WP.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.pentestpartners.com/security-blog/z-shave-exploiting-z-wave-downgrade-attacks"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…