GHSA-W5W7-4FMR-R9GV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-12-22 00:00 – Updated: 2021-12-28 00:01Dalmark Systems Systeam 2.22.8 build 1724 is vulnerable to Insecure design on report build via SQL query. The Systeam application is an ERP system that uses a mixed architecture based on SaaS tenant and user management, and on-premise database and web application counterparts. The bi report module exposes direct SQL commands via POST data in order to select data for report generation. A malicious actor can use the bi report endpoint as a direct SQL prompt under the authenticated user.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-44874"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-89"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-12-21T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Dalmark Systems Systeam 2.22.8 build 1724 is vulnerable to Insecure design on report build via SQL query. The Systeam application is an ERP system that uses a mixed architecture based on SaaS tenant and user management, and on-premise database and web application counterparts. The bi report module exposes direct SQL commands via POST data in order to select data for report generation. A malicious actor can use the bi report endpoint as a direct SQL prompt under the authenticated user.",
"id": "GHSA-w5w7-4fmr-r9gv",
"modified": "2021-12-28T00:01:15Z",
"published": "2021-12-22T00:00:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44874"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.systeam.com.br/cve/insecure%20design%20-%20sql%20manipulation-en.txt"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.