GHSA-W66P-WGWC-MQMW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-17 15:31 – Updated: 2025-11-05 00:31
VLAI?
Details

A privilege escalation from host to domain vulnerability was found in the FreeIPA project. The FreeIPA package fails to validate the uniqueness of the krbCanonicalName for the admin account by default, allowing users to create services with the same canonical name as the REALM admin. When a successful attack happens, the user can retrieve a Kerberos ticket in the name of this service, containing the admin@REALM credential. This flaw allows an attacker to perform administrative tasks over the REALM, leading to access to sensitive data and sensitive data exfiltration.

Severity ?
9.1 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-4404"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1220"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-06-17T14:15:32Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "A privilege escalation from host to domain vulnerability was found in the FreeIPA project. The FreeIPA package fails to validate the uniqueness of the `krbCanonicalName` for the admin account by default, allowing users to create services with the same canonical name as the REALM admin. When a successful attack happens, the user can retrieve a Kerberos ticket in the name of this service, containing the admin@REALM credential. This flaw allows an attacker to perform administrative tasks over the REALM, leading to access to sensitive data and sensitive data exfiltration.",
  "id": "GHSA-w66p-wgwc-mqmw",
  "modified": "2025-11-05T00:31:18Z",
  "published": "2025-06-17T15:31:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-4404"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9184"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9185"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9186"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9187"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9188"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9189"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9190"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9191"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9192"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9193"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9194"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-4404"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2364606"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pagure.io/freeipa/c/6b9400c135ed16b10057b350cc9ce42aa0e862d4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pagure.io/freeipa/c/796ed20092d554ee0c9e23295e346ec1e8a0bf6e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/30/6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.