GHSA-W6C6-QJCR-RFWC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:43 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:44
VLAI?
Details
In Wireshark 2.4.0, 2.2.0 to 2.2.8, and 2.0.0 to 2.0.14, the MSDP dissector could go into an infinite loop. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-msdp.c by adding length validation.
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-13767"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-08-30T09:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In Wireshark 2.4.0, 2.2.0 to 2.2.8, and 2.0.0 to 2.0.14, the MSDP dissector could go into an infinite loop. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-msdp.c by adding length validation.",
"id": "GHSA-w6c6-qjcr-rfwc",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:44:09Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:43:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-13767"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13933"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=6f18ace2a2683418a9368a8dfd92da6bd8213e15"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=6f18ace2a2683418a9368a8dfd92da6bd8213e15"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2017-38.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100549"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039254"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…