ghsa-w6pj-53xr-3hq6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 00:08
Modified
2022-05-02 00:08
Details

Memory leak in the http_request_parse function in request.c in lighttpd before 1.4.20 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of requests with duplicate request headers.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2008-4298",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2008-09-27T10:30:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "Memory leak in the http_request_parse function in request.c in lighttpd before 1.4.20 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of requests with duplicate request headers.",
   id: "GHSA-w6pj-53xr-3hq6",
   modified: "2022-05-02T00:08:38Z",
   published: "2022-05-02T00:08:38Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-4298",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/45471",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238180",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-11/msg00002.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/32069",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/32132",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/32480",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/32834",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/32972",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200812-04.xml",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/changeset/2305",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/ticket/1774",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://wiki.rpath.com/Advisories:rPSA-2008-0309",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Advisories:rPSA-2008-0309",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1645",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.lighttpd.net/security/lighttpd_sa_2008_07.txt",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/09/26/5",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/497932/100/0/threaded",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/31434",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2741",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.