GHSA-W799-PRG3-CX77
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:02 – Updated: 2024-10-16 20:42
VLAI?
Summary
python-jose failure to use a constant time comparison for HMAC keys
Details
python-jose before 1.3.2 allows attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to use a constant time comparison for HMAC keys.
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "python-jose"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.3.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-7036"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-208"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-31T21:03:29Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2017-01-23T21:59:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "python-jose before 1.3.2 allows attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to use a constant time comparison for HMAC keys.",
"id": "GHSA-w799-prg3-cx77",
"modified": "2024-10-16T20:42:13Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:02:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-7036"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mpdavis/python-jose/pull/35/commits/89b46353b9f611e9da38de3d2fedf52331167b93"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mpdavis/python-jose/commit/73007d6887a7517ac07c6e755e494baee49ef513"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/mpdavis/python-jose"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mpdavis/python-jose/releases/tag/1.3.2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/python-jose/PYSEC-2017-28.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20210123221523/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95845"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "python-jose failure to use a constant time comparison for HMAC keys"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…