ghsa-w7r7-qgmj-q7fh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:48
Modified
2022-05-01 23:48
Details
Microsoft Office Word 2002 SP3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .doc file that contains malformed data, as exploited in the wild in July 2008, and as demonstrated by attachement.doc.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-2244" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-07-09T22:41:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Microsoft Office Word 2002 SP3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .doc file that contains malformed data, as exploited in the wild in July 2008, and as demonstrated by attachement.doc.", "id": "GHSA-w7r7-qgmj-q7fh", "modified": "2022-05-01T23:48:09Z", "published": "2022-05-01T23:48:09Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-2244" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/43663" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5897" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/archive/2008/07/08/vulnerability-in-microsoft-word-could-allow-remote-code-execution.aspx" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=4696" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=121915960406986\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30975" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/953635.mspx" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30124" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020447" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA08-225A.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2028" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.