ghsa-w862-39x5-q88x
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 16:48
Modified
2024-03-21 03:33
Severity ?
Details
In Libgcrypt 1.8.4, the C implementation of AES is vulnerable to a flush-and-reload side-channel attack because physical addresses are available to other processes. (The C implementation is used on platforms where an assembly-language implementation is unavailable.)
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2019-12904" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-668" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2019-06-20T00:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In Libgcrypt 1.8.4, the C implementation of AES is vulnerable to a flush-and-reload side-channel attack because physical addresses are available to other processes. (The C implementation is used on platforms where an assembly-language implementation is unavailable.)", "id": "GHSA-w862-39x5-q88x", "modified": "2024-03-21T03:33:40Z", "published": "2022-05-24T16:48:28Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-12904" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/gpg/libgcrypt/commit/a4c561aab1014c3630bc88faf6f5246fee16b020" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/gpg/libgcrypt/commit/daedbbb5541cd8ecda1459d3b843ea4d92788762" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://dev.gnupg.org/T4541" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772@%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00049.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.